←back to thread

1293 points rmason | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.722s | source
Show context
socrates1998 ◴[] No.19323322[source]
Anecdotally, I work with teenagers and none of them have a Facebook pages. It's viewed as a place for old people and parents.

For me personally, it's almost impossible to deal with. Way too many political posts from my friends and family.

It's probably best use for me is local events and an occasional major event from a friend/family member.

Still, I find myself going there less and less.

From a small business standpoint, it's just not worth the time, effort and money to advertise there. It's much more effective to focus on getting referrals with my current clients.

I really wish there was a paid social media service that everyone used. I would gladly pay $5-$10 a month for something that didn't sell my data.

replies(15): >>19323410 #>>19323503 #>>19323591 #>>19323620 #>>19323626 #>>19323637 #>>19323716 #>>19323721 #>>19324033 #>>19324064 #>>19324090 #>>19324919 #>>19325055 #>>19326803 #>>19329622 #
AnimalMuppet ◴[] No.19323620[source]
> I would gladly pay $5-$10 a month for something that didn't sell my data.

Hmm. Facebook has something like 2 billion profiles. Of course, most of them wouldn't pay $5/month - say that only one percent would. 20 million profiles times $5/month = $100 million/month. It might be worth it for someone to try to build such a thing...

replies(3): >>19323701 #>>19323934 #>>19324118 #
1. throwawaymath ◴[] No.19323701[source]
I’d be beyond shocked if even one percent of all Facebook users would pay $5/month for it. I think the only population of users who’d consider doing so are the intersection of those who are affluent (by Western standards), are extremely opposed to Facebook ads, and use it enough to consider paying for it.

I’d be surprised if you could get 1% of the US population of users to consider it, let alone the global population. You’d realistically be looking at single to very low double digit millions of users at the maximum.

replies(1): >>19324291 #
2. cm2012 ◴[] No.19324291[source]
And no one wants a social network with no friends on it.