←back to thread

550 points polskibus | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.423s | source
Show context
ergothus ◴[] No.19116287[source]
I interviewed at FB recently (didn't pass the in-person) and the one question I asked each interviewer was "tell me about the parts of FB I don't see" - because they have an odd hiring process where you don't figure out what team you'd be working with until after you are hired...and I had no interest in pushing Ads, but understood that wouldn't be a great pitch from my side.

Turns out there is a LOT about ads at FB. Not everything, but a lot. Particularly in the Seattle office.

I was surprised I hadn't passed the interview (thought I did well), but in retrospect I'm glad. Whether that's sour grapes on my part, the fact the news has been full of reasons to be glad not to work at FB, or that I was very concerned that anything I did would end up pushing ads is something I can't be 100% certain of.

replies(3): >>19116484 #>>19116628 #>>19121318 #
fipple ◴[] No.19116484[source]
If you don’t want to participate in the central economic function of a company you would not have been a good hire regardless of technical skill. You don’t want employees who are willing to work at a company they think is a blight on humanity.
replies(1): >>19123021 #
1. MadWombat ◴[] No.19123021[source]
> You don’t want employees who are willing to work at a company they think is a blight on humanity.

If that was true nobody would have any henchmen

replies(1): >>19125906 #
2. fipple ◴[] No.19125906[source]
Most henchmen don’t think their bosses are bad people, because they aspire to be their bosses, and people don’t think they’re bad themselves, even when they are.