←back to thread

550 points polskibus | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jordan801 ◴[] No.19116099[source]
Anyone who has written a few scrappers knows how brutally ineffective this is. Yelp tried to pull the same thing and it took me about 3 minutes to rectify my "for fun" scraper. It's also really not that difficult to write a smart scraper that you say, "Look for these things in this post. However you find them, replicate it for the others". Which is ultimately what I made my Yelp scraper do.

If there's a pattern, I will find it, and I will exploit it. <3

replies(8): >>19116147 #>>19116340 #>>19116656 #>>19116724 #>>19117143 #>>19117402 #>>19117423 #>>19121248 #
eeeeeeeeeeeee ◴[] No.19116147[source]
Yep, seems like a total waste of time. The people scraping will spend the necessary time to get around this (and then distribute that knowledge to the masses) so it seems like a pointless arms race. Facebook employees could better use their time on developing actual features that bring value.
replies(5): >>19116174 #>>19116250 #>>19116413 #>>19116676 #>>19117180 #
matz1 ◴[] No.19116250[source]
How is this waste of time / pointless ? They do bring value for fb, they reduce the loss of ad money.
replies(1): >>19116407 #
eeeeeeeeeeeee ◴[] No.19116407[source]
Because they are fighting the people that absolutely do not want to see advertisements whatsoever (most normal people I know do not have ad-blockers), which already makes them the least likely to be attracted by advertisements. If anything, those brands are souring their reputation anytime they are seen by those kind of people in a medium that those consumers find obnoxious.

You can make a similar argument that the RIAA/MPAA going after piracy is a waste of time. Again, focus on delivering value to actual customers.

If Facebook spent more time on making a friendly ecosystem / community I would be more open to signing back up again. Instead, it seems they are hyper-focused on advertisements at the expense of everything else.

replies(2): >>19117030 #>>19117034 #
1. recursive ◴[] No.19117034[source]
> which already makes them the least likely to be attracted by advertisements. If anything, those brands are souring their reputation anytime they are seen by those kind of people in a medium that those consumers find obnoxious.

Facebook thinks otherwise. Between you and them, I suspect they are more likely to have some evidence or trials to support their position.