←back to thread

2101 points jamesjyu | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
AznHisoka ◴[] No.19106033[source]
I wasn't interested in the emotional story behind this. But I did resonate with 1 line in particular here: "It doesn’t matter how amazing your product is, or how fast you ship features. The market you’re in will determine most of your growth."

This is so true, in my experience. You hit a roadblock in recurring revenue, not because your product doesn't have enough features, or your team sucks, but simply: your market is smaller than you thought.

replies(4): >>19106340 #>>19106560 #>>19106856 #>>19107138 #
ryanSrich ◴[] No.19107138[source]
Scaling to a billion dollar company in that market was certainly attainable. Patreon started two years after Gumroad and now look where they are. Gumroad had a movers first advantage - so I really disagree with the quote. Had they continued to push feature development and tweak PMF they could have been a billion dollar company.

Don't take that as a slight to Gumroad either. Building a profitable business from almost going under and now generating close to $1m in annual profits is an incredible feat. But I do disagree with the point that the market wasn't ready (as clearly demonstrated by the success of others).

replies(3): >>19107543 #>>19108151 #>>19111533 #
1. treis ◴[] No.19111533[source]
>. Patreon started two years after Gumroad and now look where they are.

Two years away from buying back shares for $1 from their VCs?

There's this whole swath of the internet that can support thousands of small businesses that's being slashed and burned by VCs in search of a unicorn. Gumroad and Patreon are both perfect examples. They are both good ideas that are well executed. They are not, however, companies that can extract tens of millions to hundreds of millions in profit a year. They really should be 20-30 employee type companies making a steady couple of million in profit.