←back to thread

2101 points jamesjyu | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.62s | source
1. lordnacho ◴[] No.19109002[source]
Why would KPCB sell back their stake for $1? Why not just hang on to the stock just in case it turned around? The explanation that they didn't want the overhead of appointing a board member sounds strange. If you don't like the company, send a junior person who can learn board membering in an unimportant firm.
replies(3): >>19109041 #>>19109089 #>>19109364 #
2. ◴[] No.19109041[source]
3. buf ◴[] No.19109089[source]
tax loss harvesting
4. winslow ◴[] No.19109364[source]
Sounds like they wanted the tax benefit of marking a loss on the investment.