←back to thread

323 points plusCubed | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
egypturnash ◴[] No.18736059[source]
I just dug up info on how Brave’s contributions thing works and it feels like such a mess.

According to https://brave.com/publishers/

- once you have accumulated $100 in contributions they email “the webmaster at your site” and the owner of your domain according to the WHOIS. I assume this is “webmaster@domain.name”, which I sure don’t have set up on my personal site.

- you have to “check your balance frequently and transfer funds wherever you choose”, which suggests that there’s no way to just say “send my my balance every month” and forget about it.

This whole model totally breaks down when you remember that there’s a ton of independent creators who don’t have their own sites, but instead post stuff on another site. Is Brave going to realize that I’m following this particular person on YouTube, that person on Tumblr, this other person on Deviantart, etc, etc? And are they going to ping them or are they just gonna tell the people who own the site?

The page where you sign up to receive payments (https://publishers.basicattentiontoken.org) makes it sound like they understand YouTube accounts and nothing else, and as a creator whos interest in pivoting to video is nonexistent, screw that, I’ll stick with Patreon and it’s opt-in model that just transfers money into my bank account every month as long as I have patrons.

replies(8): >>18736102 #>>18736127 #>>18736278 #>>18736428 #>>18736434 #>>18736772 #>>18736773 #>>18737539 #
duxup ◴[] No.18736102[source]
That sounds so clumsy that I suspect they really don't care / want folks to fail to collect.
replies(4): >>18736285 #>>18736340 #>>18736410 #>>18736455 #
brandnewlow ◴[] No.18736455[source]
I am on the business team at Brave. We want people to collect and get paid. It's a huge part of why we come in to work every day, to work on stuff that helps creators get paid.

I'm sure there's UI/UX stuff in Patreon that could be better. That doesn't mean they don't want creators to get paid. It just means there's room for improvement.

replies(3): >>18736613 #>>18737247 #>>18738131 #
1. int_19h ◴[] No.18738131[source]
If you're sincere, then for starters, how about removing the $100 threshold immediately, and notifying all people who have had donations made to them, so that they can come and claim the money?
replies(1): >>18741248 #
2. phiresky ◴[] No.18741248[source]
You really want to get spammed with "claim your 5ct in donations for signing up on our website!" every day?
replies(1): >>18742288 #
3. int_19h ◴[] No.18742288[source]
I'm suggesting that for starters, they do it once so that people are at least aware that someone is soliciting donations in their name. I don't think that's enough, but it's the biggest source of contention.