←back to thread

323 points plusCubed | 3 comments | | HN request time: 1.218s | source
Show context
egypturnash ◴[] No.18736059[source]
I just dug up info on how Brave’s contributions thing works and it feels like such a mess.

According to https://brave.com/publishers/

- once you have accumulated $100 in contributions they email “the webmaster at your site” and the owner of your domain according to the WHOIS. I assume this is “webmaster@domain.name”, which I sure don’t have set up on my personal site.

- you have to “check your balance frequently and transfer funds wherever you choose”, which suggests that there’s no way to just say “send my my balance every month” and forget about it.

This whole model totally breaks down when you remember that there’s a ton of independent creators who don’t have their own sites, but instead post stuff on another site. Is Brave going to realize that I’m following this particular person on YouTube, that person on Tumblr, this other person on Deviantart, etc, etc? And are they going to ping them or are they just gonna tell the people who own the site?

The page where you sign up to receive payments (https://publishers.basicattentiontoken.org) makes it sound like they understand YouTube accounts and nothing else, and as a creator whos interest in pivoting to video is nonexistent, screw that, I’ll stick with Patreon and it’s opt-in model that just transfers money into my bank account every month as long as I have patrons.

replies(8): >>18736102 #>>18736127 #>>18736278 #>>18736428 #>>18736434 #>>18736772 #>>18736773 #>>18737539 #
duxup ◴[] No.18736102[source]
That sounds so clumsy that I suspect they really don't care / want folks to fail to collect.
replies(4): >>18736285 #>>18736340 #>>18736410 #>>18736455 #
egypturnash ◴[] No.18736285[source]
Yeah I suspect this is part of their overall revenue model.
replies(1): >>18736484 #
brandnewlow ◴[] No.18736484[source]
Honest question: Why do you suspect that? (I work at Brave. We're all very, very nerdy here. It'd be helpful to understand why a fellow nerd suspects we're up to no good.)
replies(14): >>18736564 #>>18736626 #>>18736759 #>>18736816 #>>18736851 #>>18736861 #>>18736865 #>>18736904 #>>18736911 #>>18736916 #>>18736958 #>>18738250 #>>18738294 #>>18738901 #
908087 ◴[] No.18736626[source]
Is the implication here that "fellow nerds" should always be given the benefit of the doubt for some reason?

I've seen some "very nerdy" people engage in some "incredibly selfish and shady" activities, so I can't help but laugh at that idea.

replies(1): >>18736724 #
brandnewlow ◴[] No.18736724[source]
Not specifically. But yes, fellow people should be given the benefit of the doubt in my opinion. I was asking if Brave had done something to merit not getting that.
replies(3): >>18737192 #>>18738864 #>>18748784 #
1. bjl ◴[] No.18737192[source]
You're on a thread about Brave shamelessly committing donation fraud and you're surprised people aren't giving you the benefit of the doubt?
replies(1): >>18737506 #
2. paulgb ◴[] No.18737506[source]
This whole episode is a case study of the way people who have convinced themselves they're doing something positive for humanity can find moral justifications for any transgressions along the way.
replies(1): >>18738682 #
3. berbec ◴[] No.18738682[source]
(putting on my Ravenclaw tie)

It's for the Greater Good™!