←back to thread

323 points plusCubed | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
egypturnash ◴[] No.18736059[source]
I just dug up info on how Brave’s contributions thing works and it feels like such a mess.

According to https://brave.com/publishers/

- once you have accumulated $100 in contributions they email “the webmaster at your site” and the owner of your domain according to the WHOIS. I assume this is “webmaster@domain.name”, which I sure don’t have set up on my personal site.

- you have to “check your balance frequently and transfer funds wherever you choose”, which suggests that there’s no way to just say “send my my balance every month” and forget about it.

This whole model totally breaks down when you remember that there’s a ton of independent creators who don’t have their own sites, but instead post stuff on another site. Is Brave going to realize that I’m following this particular person on YouTube, that person on Tumblr, this other person on Deviantart, etc, etc? And are they going to ping them or are they just gonna tell the people who own the site?

The page where you sign up to receive payments (https://publishers.basicattentiontoken.org) makes it sound like they understand YouTube accounts and nothing else, and as a creator whos interest in pivoting to video is nonexistent, screw that, I’ll stick with Patreon and it’s opt-in model that just transfers money into my bank account every month as long as I have patrons.

replies(8): >>18736102 #>>18736127 #>>18736278 #>>18736428 #>>18736434 #>>18736772 #>>18736773 #>>18737539 #
brandnewlow ◴[] No.18736428[source]
I work at Brave on the business team. This is helpful feedback.

Brave is a startup with a small team earnestly building a new thing that combines a browser with a tipping system, with creator tools, with ad blocking... it's ambitious!

As it's a new thing, describing it can be messy sometimes. We're always working to make our language better and clearer though. Thank you for letting us know it fell short for you.

To address a point:

We know there's a lot of creators on a lot of platforms. At the moment, we've built support for creator channels in the form of web sites, Youtube channels and Twitch channels. When I joined this past summer I had the same reaction. "What about Tumblr? What about Twitter?" Each new platform takes time to write support for and we have a long list of features requests. We'll get there!

replies(6): >>18736585 #>>18737432 #>>18737479 #>>18737631 #>>18738025 #>>18742727 #
1. jonahhorowitz ◴[] No.18736585[source]
Here's the deal. If you want what you're proposing to work - you need to copy the model that Google briefly used with Google Contributor.

Bid on the exchanges for the ads you want to block. Then serve cat pictures (or whatever). The creators will get paid through the existing payment infrastructure and you don't need to build an entirely parallel, opt-in system that will probably never gain enough traction to be worth using.

replies(1): >>18736789 #
2. Klathmon ◴[] No.18736789[source]
I'm still amazed and saddened that the original Contributor didn't work out.

It was such a great concept that would work all the way from first introduction to a hypothetical future where everyone uses this and nobody sees ads.

replies(1): >>18737130 #
3. jonahhorowitz ◴[] No.18737130[source]
Agreed.

That said, it's better if it's someone other than Google doing it. Google only has access to bid on the Google exchanges, but a 3rd party can bid on AppNexus, private exchanges (WSJ), etc.