←back to thread

1798 points jerryX | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.444s | source
Show context
jackgavigan ◴[] No.18568466[source]
IANAL, but 35 U.S. Code § 115 requires that "each individual who is the inventor or a joint inventor of a claimed invention in an application for patent shall execute an oath or declaration" that they believe "himself or herself to be the original inventor or an original joint inventor of a claimed invention in the application," and acknowledging "that any willful false statement made in such declaration or statement is punishable under section 1001 of title 18 by fine or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both."

So... How is this not literally a crime?

replies(5): >>18568684 #>>18568700 #>>18569184 #>>18570123 #>>18570938 #
hartator ◴[] No.18568684[source]
This. Google should also probably take disciplinary actions.
replies(1): >>18569140 #
1. 2_listerine_pls ◴[] No.18569140[source]
You are kidding right? They even encourage it by making you sign a visitor agreement so that you have no right to the IP you discuss.
replies(1): >>18573371 #
2. jacques_chester ◴[] No.18573371[source]
Invention is not the same as assignment. You can sign away assignment, but inventorship remains with the inventor(s).