←back to thread

1798 points jerryX | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.449s | source
1. DyslexicAtheist ◴[] No.18567999[source]
I wonder if a first line of defense could be to license the work as AGPL. Google would then probably not use it AFAIK
replies(1): >>18568680 #
2. rasz ◴[] No.18568680[source]
Wont prevent them from trying https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/08/after-patent-office-re...