←back to thread

1798 points jerryX | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.734s | source
Show context
titanomachy ◴[] No.18567534[source]
On a certain level, it makes sense. Google wants to patent it to cover their bases and make sure no one else does the same thing and blocks them. It's a rational move in a shitty game.
replies(2): >>18567579 #>>18569490 #
hajderr ◴[] No.18567579[source]
"Rational move". Think about that for a second. Morally wrong doesn't really reach anyone's mind these days.
replies(2): >>18567614 #>>18567653 #
1. seangrant ◴[] No.18567653[source]
How would it look if someone else got the patent and completely blocked Google? It's not even a question for large companies. The issue is this archaic patent and copyright system where someone "owns" an idea... Absurd.
replies(2): >>18567763 #>>18567898 #
2. bsaul ◴[] No.18567763[source]
This type of argument doesn’t stand here. Since the truth is that there is prior art, and the right thing to do is to make sure nobody got the patent, google could have make sure nobody get the patent.

Ironically that’s what they ended up doing, but i doubt it was on purpose.

3. EugeneOZ ◴[] No.18567898[source]
It's not their work for starters.