←back to thread

2024 points randlet | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.374s | source
Show context
theandrewbailey ◴[] No.17516370[source]
Python was my first programming language, ~15 years ago. The bracket- and semicolon-free syntax is beautiful and approachable to this day. Python is my go-to for writing data format conversion scripts. I wrote a random sentence generator in Python 10 years ago that gave me and my friends hours of entertainment.

Thanks, Guido, for the good times!

replies(1): >>17517645 #
fit2rule ◴[] No.17517645[source]
I can never get into Python and end up with as much passion as you. For me, its a very powerful and useful language - no doubt about it.

But the aesthetics of a whitespace language just don't jive with my 30+ years of experience writing code. No matter how many times I try over the past few decades, I just can't get passionate about writing Python code. I know its power, and I totally grok its value to our industry - but for me, Lua is just far more elegant, even if it doesn't ship with all of Pythons' goosebridles. Lua is my go-to scripting language; I only ever use Python if I have to - i.e. its enforced on me by others.

I really do try to get over this personal handicap, often enough, but the moment I have to start thinking about indentation I just lose all the passion and it starts feeling like a drag. What a dilemma, because I know it has been used for many, many great things .. I just wish I could get over my aversion to white-space'ing things all the time. I've tried editor after editor (well, expect the Python-specific things), but it just doesn't click.

Ah well.

replies(6): >>17517931 #>>17519165 #>>17519828 #>>17521140 #>>17521516 #>>17535913 #
enriquto ◴[] No.17521516[source]
> but for me, Lua is just far more elegant,

It's curious... Lua is my favorite language due to its elegance, but I would love it even more if it used significant indentation (using tabs, of course) instead of "end" blocks.

replies(2): >>17521701 #>>17523706 #
sebcat ◴[] No.17521701[source]
OTOH, I would love Python even more if I could do:

    x = function(x) return x*x end
and not use those awful Python lambdas...

Not that it really matters though, bridges still get built.

replies(3): >>17522056 #>>17522565 #>>17524098 #
enriquto ◴[] No.17522565[source]
it looks a bit perverse to use the same name for the function and for its argument, but maybe it's just me
replies(1): >>17523106 #
1. sebcat ◴[] No.17523106[source]
Lexical scope, I like it