←back to thread

2024 points randlet | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
AdmiralAsshat ◴[] No.17515876[source]
What was the issue that was evidently so contentious that it made him wish to step down?
replies(5): >>17515913 #>>17515941 #>>17515956 #>>17515958 #>>17515959 #
Analemma_ ◴[] No.17515959[source]
(a := b) rather than a = b

Naturally people went to the barricades for it, in a classic example of bikeshedding and Wadler's Law (programmers will fight to the death over trivial syntax disagreements and just shrug at profound changes to semantics and architecture)

replies(4): >>17516054 #>>17516202 #>>17516377 #>>17517585 #
1. Sohcahtoa82 ◴[] No.17517585[source]
> (a := b) rather than a = b

That's not it at all. The PEP even acknowledges that while `(a := b)` would be valid, it would not be recommended.