←back to thread

2024 points randlet | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.596s | source
Show context
Tenoke ◴[] No.17515920[source]
I got to say, HN has become much looser with the titles since dang took over. It could be for the better (or not), but I definitely see at least 5 top posts a week with an editorialized title now, compared to a lot less before.

Edit: Everyone is saying it is fine. Again I'm not saying it is not, but if it is, can you please update this part of the guidelines:

>Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait. Don't editorialize.

replies(5): >>17515940 #>>17515942 #>>17515962 #>>17516071 #>>17516115 #
apendleton ◴[] No.17515940[source]
It's a direct quote from the email. Do you think it was taken out of context in a way that communicates editorial intent? Seems pretty directly connected to the contents of the message to me.
replies(2): >>17515983 #>>17516011 #
1. Tenoke ◴[] No.17516011[source]
Quote from the text used to be the most common type of editorializing to be reverted/disallowed before... And at any rate, I said it could be for the better - I've just been noticing this more and more.