←back to thread

371 points timqian | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.954s | source
Show context
bojo ◴[] No.17471265[source]
There's been many a discussion here about companies holding out for the perfect candidate, curious to see how many jobs go unfilled for how long.
replies(5): >>17471359 #>>17471581 #>>17471656 #>>17471684 #>>17473084 #
cottonseed ◴[] No.17471684[source]
I keep making the same posting but I've hired ~4 people and I'm still growing. One posting equals one job is a bad assumption.
replies(1): >>17472193 #
ryandrake ◴[] No.17472193[source]
Good to know. I have a half-finished project I was going to snarkily call “Who’s Not Hiring” that parses through HN Who’s Hiring archives and lists the companies who post the same ad month after month despite the so-called robust hiring market.
replies(1): >>17472689 #
anothergoogler ◴[] No.17472689[source]
Nice! If you analyze gaps, you could use it to identify companies experiencing consistent churn too, perpetually re-hiring their engineering org.
replies(1): >>17472707 #
hobls ◴[] No.17472707{3}[source]
You'd also identify companies who are growing their teams slowly and adding more of the same role every N months.
replies(1): >>17474290 #
anothergoogler ◴[] No.17474290[source]
Job titles and descriptions could help in distinguishing between new and replaced roles. You'd want to look for fairly identical postings.
replies(1): >>17474394 #
hobls ◴[] No.17474394[source]
I think you might be overestimating the consistency and reliability of how hiring is done. (For reference, I've worked as a hiring manager of software engineers for a few years.) I've seen departments just use the same description over and over for years, and share it between teams -- even when it's not even really correct at some point.

Practices vary wildly between company, and even between hiring managers.

replies(1): >>17477136 #
1. toomuchtodo ◴[] No.17477136[source]
You could scrape LinkedIn for people who had been at those orgs for a short bit of time. Frequent posts of the same job description + LinkedIn churn evidence = red flag.