←back to thread

235 points ChrisArchitect | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.209s | source
Show context
dingo_bat ◴[] No.16849980[source]
The real reason why OLPC failed is that children in downtrodden countries don't need a laptop. They need food, a healthy environment, good old fashioned classroom education and plenty of pens and notebooks. A laptop is the worst tool you can use for studying.

I went through my entire school and undergraduate college without once bringing my laptop into the classroom. My mother and father learned to program in FORTRAN using nothing but pen, paper and the occasional slide rule.

Paper books, decent sized notebooks and ballpoint pens. Spend $100 on that. That will actually help. This whole project was solving a first world problem in the third world.

replies(14): >>16850187 #>>16850282 #>>16850366 #>>16850820 #>>16850842 #>>16850900 #>>16851105 #>>16851164 #>>16851596 #>>16855334 #>>16855578 #>>16856484 #>>16858550 #>>16858800 #
hindsightbias ◴[] No.16851596[source]
I'm wondering if there's any evidence that classroom education in the First World has benefited from laptops.

Any peer-reviewed studies on a grade school computer-based curricula out there?

replies(2): >>16859539 #>>16861487 #
1. pbhjpbhj ◴[] No.16859539[source]
I think the problem is that the tech gets implemented by general subject teachers, often without proper support (in UK).

You need comprehensively designed curricula that can exploit all the tech available in a completely integrated way. Instead it seems you get a pile of tablets, then a subscription to an online system, and it relies on the particular teachers comfort level with the tech and willingness to include it.

In UK schools the use of tech seems mostly unsophisticated.