←back to thread

235 points ChrisArchitect | 3 comments | | HN request time: 1.679s | source
Show context
dingo_bat ◴[] No.16849980[source]
The real reason why OLPC failed is that children in downtrodden countries don't need a laptop. They need food, a healthy environment, good old fashioned classroom education and plenty of pens and notebooks. A laptop is the worst tool you can use for studying.

I went through my entire school and undergraduate college without once bringing my laptop into the classroom. My mother and father learned to program in FORTRAN using nothing but pen, paper and the occasional slide rule.

Paper books, decent sized notebooks and ballpoint pens. Spend $100 on that. That will actually help. This whole project was solving a first world problem in the third world.

replies(14): >>16850187 #>>16850282 #>>16850366 #>>16850820 #>>16850842 #>>16850900 #>>16851105 #>>16851164 #>>16851596 #>>16855334 #>>16855578 #>>16856484 #>>16858550 #>>16858800 #
1. saas_co_de ◴[] No.16855578[source]
What they really need is a Chinese smartphone running android for $50 ...
replies(2): >>16856654 #>>16857150 #
2. akvadrako ◴[] No.16856654[source]
Or a tablet for a similar price. This basically serves the same purpose as an OLPC but with a much bigger ecosystem and economies of scale.
3. imtringued ◴[] No.16857150[source]
The article talked about children preferring smartphones but also that they are less ruggedized and break more easily. In this regard OLPC is a success.