What's being studied?
Fun fact: CCNA classes regularly use 1.1.1.1 as a router-id. Really good reason now not to configure it via a loopback address.
What's being studied?
Fun fact: CCNA classes regularly use 1.1.1.1 as a router-id. Really good reason now not to configure it via a loopback address.
> We will be destroying all “raw” DNS data as soon as we have performed statistical analysis on the data flow. We will not be compiling any form of profiles of activity that could be used to identify individuals, and we will ensure that any retained processed data is sufficiently generic that it will not be susceptible to efforts to reconstruct individual profiles. Furthermore, the access to the primary data feed will be strictly limited to the researchers in APNIC Labs, and we will naturally abide by APNIC’s non-disclosure policies.
So it's a 5 year research program, with options to extend it as a research program. To me, that means they intend to keep DNS data for up to 5 years (or longer) before performing statistical analysis and processing on it. Here is APNIC Labs's privacy policy http://labs.apnic.net/privacy.shtml and APNIC's privacy policy https://www.apnic.net/about-apnic/corporate-documents/docume...
So much for "privacy-first".
The highlight point to me is that they not only say that won't collect data that could be used to identify individuals, but seem to realize even seemingly anonymized data can be traced back to individuals too, hence the further claim.
I'm inclined to give APNIC the benefit of the doubt, they're a nonprofit, and a fundamental part of the Internet's addressing structure, but it'd be nice to get a bit more detail from them on what they :do: collect.