←back to thread

1895 points _l4jh | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ajross ◴[] No.16727942[source]
This is the Cloudflare resolver, right? What's the "privacy-first" part about? It's just another third party DNS host. They haven't changed the protocol to be uninspectable and AFAIK haven't made any guarantees about logging or whatnot that would enhance privacy vs. using whatever you are now. This just means you're trusting Cloudflare instead of Comcast or Google or whoever.
replies(8): >>16727953 #>>16727957 #>>16727960 #>>16727965 #>>16727968 #>>16727969 #>>16727975 #>>16727978 #
vimda ◴[] No.16727965[source]
Did you read the page? They're supporting DNS over TLS and DNS over HTTPS - both changes to the protocol to make in uninspectable. They've also said they're not logging IP info and they're getting independent auditors in to confirm what they're saying. Sounds trustworthy to me
replies(2): >>16728018 #>>16729162 #
dingaling ◴[] No.16728018[source]
Both encrypted extensions are of course inspectable at the end-point, which is the privacy model being discussed.

What is intriguing to me is why Cloudflare are offering this. Perhaps it is to provide data on traffic that is 'invisible' to them, as in it doesn't currently touch their networks. Possibly as a sales-lead generator.

Or is the plan to become dominant and then use DNS blackholing to shutdown malware that is a threat to their systems?

replies(2): >>16728038 #>>16728336 #
1. zackbloom ◴[] No.16728336[source]
The goal is to make the sites that use Cloudflare ridiculously fast by putting the authoritative and recursive DNS on the same machine (for clients who use 1.1.1.1).