(blog.cloudflare.com)

1895 points _l4jh | 1 comments | 01 Apr 18 12:14 UTC | HN request time: 0.253s | source

Show context

infinisil ◴[01 Apr 18 12:40 UTC] No.16727966[source]▶

>>16727869 (OP) #

9.9.9.9 [1] has been praised by a bunch of people in the thread from a couple days ago [2]. How do those two compare?

[1] https://www.quad9.net/

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16716606

replies(6): >>16727979 #>>16727988 #>>16728107 #>>16728131 #>>16728194 #>>16728214 #

1. okket ◴[01 Apr 18 12:44 UTC] No.16727988[source]▶

>>16727966 #

"Here are some DNS measurements comparing @Google Public DNS, @Quad9DNS and @Cloudflare, v6 and v4. Sourced from AS3320 near Frankfurt. Quad9 is fastest in avg. The proposed v6 address from Cloudflare is not yet working, but the longer ones."

https://twitter.com/webernetz/status/980055981282484225

↑

1.1.1.1: Fast, privacy-first consumer DNS service