←back to thread

370 points sillypuddy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.231s | source
Show context
sho ◴[] No.16407784[source]
What is crazy about the the situation in SF is that even 5 or so years ago if you asked me what the "echo chamber" there was echoing I would have said libertarianism and some kind of techno-utopianism. The takeover by the proscriptive far-left has been astonishingly rapid, and it is absolutely real. I also know people who have left, and many more who absolutely keep their political and even philosophical views to themselves, especially after Damore.

It's been an extraordinarily fast takeover and I'd really like to know exactly what happened those 5 or so years ago to precipitate this seismic shift.

replies(12): >>16407829 #>>16407852 #>>16408051 #>>16408373 #>>16408535 #>>16408579 #>>16408654 #>>16409124 #>>16409352 #>>16409442 #>>16409598 #>>16418302 #
wz1000 ◴[] No.16408051[source]
> The takeover by the proscriptive far-left

Americans have a very weird conception of what "far-left" means. Liberal feel good minority appeasement by billion dollar multinational corporations is as far from "far-left" as you can get.

replies(6): >>16408626 #>>16408638 #>>16408649 #>>16408956 #>>16409254 #>>16411049 #
psyc ◴[] No.16409254[source]
It's very difficult to choose a single term to describe the cultural cluster that sho is referring to, that would not result in quibbling over the term, or whether it's a thing. I know which cultural cluster he's talking about. Closely related or alternate terms include social justice warrior, authoritarian left, regressive left, cultural marxist, identity politics, oppression stack, 3rd wave feminist, virtue-signaling left, neo-puritan, and so on. I've omitted a dozen other terms that are more like slurs, but I'm still a bit disappointed that most of these have some degree of negative connotation. I can't think of a totally neutral term that would be recognizable.
replies(1): >>16417550 #
throwitawaypls ◴[] No.16417550[source]
Progressive? That’s what they call themselves, mostly.
replies(1): >>16417788 #
1. psyc ◴[] No.16417788[source]
I’m sure they do, but to me that term is much broader than the subculture I’m trying to describe.