←back to thread

370 points sillypuddy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
tempz ◴[] No.16408684[source]
There is a linguistic sleight of hand at work here: 'libertarian' and 'left' is not what is happening in SV. These terms have been hijacked by the identity politics cartel.

The SV political and ideological climate is all about pidgeonholing you into 0.01-0.3% segment ('left-handed bisexual javascript expert'), then maintaining these segments and manipulating the fractured society into neoliberal directions.

It is obvious that there is nothing that can be named as a common interest in SV: there is no such discourse. The commonality is restricted to your 0.01-0.3% segment.

replies(2): >>16408908 #>>16408933 #
Pixeleen ◴[] No.16408908[source]
You're telling me! We transsexuals are a great example, having been co-opted in recent years to make liberals/postmodernists look good. We are just too convenient of a packaged identity now that gays are not a big deal any more. I feel for Thiel, he may be a "public person" with his commentary, but his sex life is private. Everybody knows that you are not supposed to pry (most of us just want to move on with our life), but somehow there is an exception if you are "supportive", "accepting", or "progressive", and it becomes acceptable to gossip about. They all want to feel smug about having the one token tranny friend.

You would not believe how fast I have gone from being treated like a darling to being torn to pieces by liberal ideologues, when it comes to light that I hold unapproved political views, that I do not snarkily put down people who believe in God, or that I had supported Trump.

replies(1): >>16409012 #
mlloyd ◴[] No.16409012[source]
Completely aside from this, how can you support Trump while knowing that he doesn't support you and his VP actively fights against LGBT rights?
replies(4): >>16409186 #>>16409361 #>>16409490 #>>16409499 #
tomp ◴[] No.16409186[source]
You do realize that (1) politics is multi-dimensional, (2) trans-issues are far too unimportant for Trump to actually care about and (3) US has good enough legal system that there's approximately 0 chance that Trump can actually do anything agains trans people (I mean he can't even manage to ban foreign Muslims).
replies(3): >>16409286 #>>16409541 #>>16410239 #
sterlind ◴[] No.16409541{3}[source]
Have you been following Trump's DoJ, and the military ban? You're simply uninformed, he can and has been doing things to harm us.

Our legal system is fragile and it's not at all clear that trans rights will win the day.

replies(1): >>16409574 #
1. dragonwriter ◴[] No.16409574{4}[source]
> Have you been following Trump's DoJ, and the military ban?

Or his education department? For something that isn't a priority, his Administration is acting strongly, broadly, and consistently on rolling back trans protections.