←back to thread

370 points sillypuddy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
tempz ◴[] No.16408684[source]
There is a linguistic sleight of hand at work here: 'libertarian' and 'left' is not what is happening in SV. These terms have been hijacked by the identity politics cartel.

The SV political and ideological climate is all about pidgeonholing you into 0.01-0.3% segment ('left-handed bisexual javascript expert'), then maintaining these segments and manipulating the fractured society into neoliberal directions.

It is obvious that there is nothing that can be named as a common interest in SV: there is no such discourse. The commonality is restricted to your 0.01-0.3% segment.

replies(2): >>16408908 #>>16408933 #
Pixeleen ◴[] No.16408908[source]
You're telling me! We transsexuals are a great example, having been co-opted in recent years to make liberals/postmodernists look good. We are just too convenient of a packaged identity now that gays are not a big deal any more. I feel for Thiel, he may be a "public person" with his commentary, but his sex life is private. Everybody knows that you are not supposed to pry (most of us just want to move on with our life), but somehow there is an exception if you are "supportive", "accepting", or "progressive", and it becomes acceptable to gossip about. They all want to feel smug about having the one token tranny friend.

You would not believe how fast I have gone from being treated like a darling to being torn to pieces by liberal ideologues, when it comes to light that I hold unapproved political views, that I do not snarkily put down people who believe in God, or that I had supported Trump.

replies(1): >>16409012 #
mlloyd ◴[] No.16409012[source]
Completely aside from this, how can you support Trump while knowing that he doesn't support you and his VP actively fights against LGBT rights?
replies(4): >>16409186 #>>16409361 #>>16409490 #>>16409499 #
1. pjscott ◴[] No.16409361[source]
You could believe that standard Republican policy is overall better than standard Democratic policy. Trump has been pretty conventional on actual policy so far; if you ignore the words he says and focus on the actions he seems like a less interventionist version of the Georges Bush.

You could find some plank of Trump's platform -- deregulation, for instance -- to be crucially important, and consider the rest of it to be pretty boring and less consequential.

You could consider him a moderate stopgap against [insert unhappy statement about Democratic agenda here].

There are plenty of innocent reasons why one might support Donald Trump.

(I voted against him, for what it's worth.)