←back to thread

370 points sillypuddy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.211s | source
Show context
andrewjl ◴[] No.16407751[source]
I find the recent uptick in progressivism in SV refreshing, and sorely needed. Then again, I've lived my entire life in liberal enclaves and do not personally identify with conservative / "family values" viewpoints.
replies(2): >>16407919 #>>16408662 #
freyir ◴[] No.16407919[source]
San Francisco’s “progressivism” is undermined by how terribly the city operates. Dirty streets, aging infrastructure, crime, homelessness, laissez faire law enforcement, conservative housing policies, and extreme wealth inequality everywhere. If the progressives can’t get their own house in order, good luck selling their vision to the rest of the country.
replies(5): >>16408382 #>>16408556 #>>16408576 #>>16408608 #>>16411092 #
heurist ◴[] No.16408382[source]
The entire country has awful city planning, SF just happens to be a highly visible example with some unique problems.

Conservatives have plenty of issues as well - look at Kansas or Alabama. Don't see those being discussed at a national level, though the politics that drove them into the ground as now steering the federal government.

replies(2): >>16408555 #>>16409140 #
1. freyir ◴[] No.16409140[source]
Cities in Kansas and Alabama may be struggling, but San Francisco has a strong local economy due to the tech industry and it spends a lot more money than most cities. Here's San Francisco's budget expenditures per resident, as compared to other cities:

  SF:      $11,600
  DC:      $11,000
  NYC:      $9,800
  Seattle:  $7,950
  Portland: $7,454
  Austin:   $4,114
  Chicago:  $3,626
  Philly:   $2,810
  Dallas:   $2,367
  LA:       $2,313
  Columbus: $1,035
Lots of money spent and very little to show for it.