←back to thread

370 points sillypuddy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.21s | source
Show context
andybak ◴[] No.16406990[source]
Rather worryingly this got flagged and killed. Hopefully we're still at the point where we can sensibly discuss a WSJ article.
replies(5): >>16407019 #>>16407659 #>>16407864 #>>16408533 #>>16408580 #
1. city41 ◴[] No.16408533[source]
I'm unable to sensibly discuss a WSJ article because I am not willing to pay to read it. Where does HN stand on pay to read articles? I didn't flag it btw.