←back to thread

CDC gets list of forbidden words

(www.washingtonpost.com)
382 points js2 | 4 comments | 16 Dec 17 02:17 UTC | HN request time: 0.234s | source
Show context
jimjimjim ◴[16 Dec 17 03:29 UTC] No.15937289[source]▶
How can anybody actually support the current administration if this sort of thing is what is being pushed. how is this improving the world? how is this better? how is this good?

anyone?

replies(3): >>15937336 #>>15937379 #>>15937472 #
ams6110 ◴[16 Dec 17 03:41 UTC] No.15937379[source]▶
You are aware that many people said pretty much the same thing about many of Obama's initiatives and policies.
replies(2): >>15937392 #>>15937565 #
mulmen ◴[16 Dec 17 04:06 UTC] No.15937565[source]▶
What's your point? Does that somehow give all future administrations carte blanche?
replies(1): >>15937701 #
ams6110 ◴[16 Dec 17 04:35 UTC] No.15937701[source]▶
My point is that anyone can cherry pick something and turn it into a general "how can anyone support this administration" when of course the reality is more complicated. People who didn't like Obama did exactly the same thing.
replies(1): >>15937733 #
1. jimjimjim ◴[16 Dec 17 04:41 UTC] No.15937733[source]▶
so you are ok with the cdc not being allowed to use those words?
replies(1): >>15937740 #
2. ryanx435 ◴[16 Dec 17 04:43 UTC] No.15937740[source]▶
Your missing the point, and based on your other posts, your probably missing it on purpose.
replies(2): >>15937839 #>>15938067 #
3. jimjimjim ◴[16 Dec 17 05:08 UTC] No.15937839[source]▶
i see the point of your statement. but it is not an answer to the original questions.
4. retrogradeorbit ◴[16 Dec 17 06:09 UTC] No.15938067[source]▶
You have been judged guilty of thought crime.