←back to thread

757 points shak77 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.273s | source
Show context
proaralyst ◴[] No.15931920[source]
Looks like it's a promo for Mr Robot, which is really not ok.

> What's happening? Are you a fan of Mr Robot? Are you trying to solve one of the many puzzles that the Mr Robot team has built? You’re on the right track. Firefox and Mr Robot have collaborated on a shared experience to further your immersion into the Mr Robot universe, also known as an Alternate Reality Game (ARG). The effects you’re seeing are a part of this shared experience.[0]

EDIT: looking at this[1] comment, perhaps it's not a promo?

[0]: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/lookingglass [1]: https://www.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/7jh9rv/what_is_loo...

replies(6): >>15931970 #>>15931979 #>>15931992 #>>15932342 #>>15932797 #>>15934413 #
exelius ◴[] No.15931992[source]
Seems kind of like it is part of an ARG. I can't say I'm totally against something like that; Mozilla's gotta make money somehow, and as long as it's not selling out user privacy it's a better tradeoff than Chrome.
replies(5): >>15932063 #>>15932139 #>>15932770 #>>15935244 #>>15936309 #
tamriel ◴[] No.15932063[source]
> Mozilla's gotta make money somehow

They're a nonprofit; they're not allowed to just "make money". And, they already take donations.

replies(6): >>15932081 #>>15932086 #>>15932213 #>>15932708 #>>15934780 #>>15936331 #
hbosch ◴[] No.15932081[source]
I think the the term “non-profit” is more about how an organization spends the money, rather than how they make it. Non profits and charities definitely bring in money through channels other than donations...
replies(3): >>15932184 #>>15932230 #>>15932239 #
tamriel ◴[] No.15932230[source]
I agree.

I merely challenge the notion that a nonprofit -- which proudly tumpets its benevolence and non-profitness -- should get a free pass for covertly installing advertising arrangements, just because they need to "make money".

Their charter and marketing is all about defending the internet from the companies doing shady things to make money, so they can't have their cake and eat it.

replies(3): >>15932921 #>>15932986 #>>15933481 #
djsumdog ◴[] No.15932921[source]
There is a difference between a non-profit and a non-for-profit (most health insurance companies are the later; go try and figure that out).

Firefox gets most of its donations from corporate sponsors. That's why the default search and switched back and fourth between Yahoo and Google; it's all about the amount of money they contribute for that. I'm not sure, but Pocket might be another example.

User contributions are actually pretty low. They don't go out and request them though like NPR or Wikipedia.

replies(2): >>15933640 #>>15936343 #
1. bigbugbag ◴[] No.15936343[source]
You're confusing mozilla foundation and mozilla corporation here. The default search with google and yahoo is not donations for the foundation but a commercial contract with the corporation.

I'm not sure mozilla even gets a significant amount of donations compared to their commercial contracts.