←back to thread

757 points shak77 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.211s | source
Show context
blauditore ◴[] No.15932880[source]
Many people seem to be shocked because Mozilla installed an add-on automatically. In my opinion, it doesn't really matter since the code is coming from Mozilla - they're building the whole browser, so they could introduce functionality anywhere. If someone distrusts their add-ons, why trust their browser at all?

The main question is what behavior is being introduced. I haven't researched deeply, but apparently the add-on does nothing until the user opts-in on studies.

replies(16): >>15932942 #>>15932953 #>>15932998 #>>15932999 #>>15933001 #>>15933342 #>>15933599 #>>15933649 #>>15933656 #>>15933806 #>>15933901 #>>15934475 #>>15934693 #>>15935133 #>>15935703 #>>15941934 #
1. pmlnr ◴[] No.15932942[source]
> it doesn't really matter since the code is coming from Mozilla

For now, yes. Until someone finds a way to push a "study" through which is not from someone "trusted".

> If someone distrusts their add-ons, why trust their browser at all?

Well, trust is rather simple to break, and this - remote installing things - was not part of my original trust I put in Firefox 1.0. I know things change. This is not one I tolerate, and you are right: I will not trust a browser after a step like this.

Besides the trust, it's unexpected data. Probably don't effect many on big data plans, and is probably a tiny extension this time, but it's still data I have not asked for.