It scared the hell out of me! Are these guys losing their minds?
It was reported as a bug and the response thus far is indeed underwhelming for such a severe issue: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1424977
It scared the hell out of me! Are these guys losing their minds?
It was reported as a bug and the response thus far is indeed underwhelming for such a severe issue: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1424977
Comments like yours are illustrative of a certain mindset. When you encounter the complexity of domains you are not intimately familiar with (court system, law, finance, etc), and those complexities are designed specifically to make it hard for you to protect yourself, I'm sure you are just as understanding as you are now.
Fuck this shit, in the past months we had CliqZ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15421708, we had Mozilla adding new telemetry, we had Mozilla force-enable toolkit.telemetry.enabled, we had Mozilla say that, if you download Nightly, that is considered opt-in to tracking, we had Mozilla put Google Analytics into the Addons menu (because it’s loaded from addons.mozilla.org: https://github.com/mozilla/addons-frontend/issues/2785 ), and we had Mozilla say that, if we don’t trust Google, we shouldn’t use Firefox.
Fuck this.
If you asked me "where would you go to change settings to prevent the browser from violating your privacy and infringing on your security?", then, yes, I would go to "Privacy and Security". If, however, you asked me "what would you expect to find under 'Privacy and Security'?", my answer would be that that's where I would go to protect myself from malicious websites, not from malicious browsers.
(I know that 'malicious' is quite, and almost certainly too, strong here, but the point is that I think, and am explicitly encouraged to think, of Mozilla as being on my side against the sites I visit, and I don't think it's natural to expect that I will start thinking of how I need to protect myself from Mozilla to use their products in the way that I, rather than they, intend.)
Features
Disabled Encrypted Media Extensions (EME)
Disabled Web Runtime (deprecated as of 2015)
Removed Pocket
Removed Telemetry
Removed data collection
Removed startup profiling
Allow running of all 64-Bit NPAPI plugins
Allow running of unsigned extensions
Removal of Sponsored Tiles on New Tab Page
Addition of Duplicate Tab option
Locale selector in about:preferences > General
[1]: https://www.waterfoxproject.org/I also recommend waterfox instead of firefox.
[1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/privacy-setti... [2]: https://www.waterfoxproject.org/
network.websocket.enabled
network.IDN_show_punycode
dom.event.clipboardevents.enabled
dom.storage.enabled
dom.indexedDB.enabled
dom.battery.enabled
dom.enable_user_timing
dom.enable_resource_timing
dom.netinfo.enabled
layout.css.visited_links_enabled
browser.safebrowsing.phishing.enabled
browser.safebrowsing.downloads.remote.enabled
browser.safebrowsing.malware.enabled
browser.send_pings
beacon.enabled
privacy.donottrackheader.enabled
privacy.trackingprotection.enabled
dom.enable_performance
datareporting.healthreport.service.enabled
datareporting.healthreport.uploadEnabled
toolkit.telemetry.enabled
toolkit.telemetry.unified
media.peerconnection.enabled
media.peerconnection.ice.default_address_only
media.peerconnection.ice.no_host
media.eme.enabled
media.gmp-eme-adobe.enabled
webgl.disabled
geo.enabled
camera.control.face_detection.enabled
device.sensors.enabled
security.tls.unrestricted_rc4_fallback
security.tls.insecure_fallback_hosts.use_static_list
security.ssl.require_safe_negotiation
security.ssl.treat_unsafe_negotiation_as_broken
Doing someone online searching now, not seeing an explanation for it. There is one other HN post though, also mentioning it in a privacy context, but not further info either. :/
Every browser vendor has this control over you when you use their browser. Some have even more, because they don't even need to tell you about it when they're closed-source.