←back to thread

441 points ploggingdev | 8 comments | | HN request time: 1.054s | source | bottom
1. bsdnoob ◴[] No.15734734[source]
openbsd vs qubes os, which one will you prefer?
replies(4): >>15734798 #>>15734805 #>>15734906 #>>15736889 #
2. JoachimSchipper ◴[] No.15734798[source]
As an OpenBSD fan: consider Qubes instead if you want a "desktop" experience. OpenBSD works fine, but the open-source desktop is quite vulnerable (consider how many things need to go wrong for https://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.nl/2016/12/redux-comprom...), and a lot of OpenBSD's hardening is in the (simpler) base system, not in GNOME / KDE / Firefox / Chrome / ...

Alternatively, consider not running a full-blown desktop or using Windows, which has grown a lot more secure since the Windows XP pre-SP2 days.

replies(1): >>15736224 #
3. muxator ◴[] No.15734805[source]
Are openbsd and qubes really comparable?
replies(1): >>15735931 #
4. rmdoss ◴[] No.15734906[source]
QubesOS -> Secure Desktop

OpenBSD -> Secure & minimal Server

OpenBSD doesn't have the isolation and hardening on the desktop apps, as Qubes has.

5. fasquoika ◴[] No.15735931[source]
To a certain degree. If you're unfamiliar with OpenBSD, security is basically its #1 priority and it's often recommended when you want better security on your server
6. rebuilder ◴[] No.15736224[source]
Wow, your recommendation for desktop security is either not running a full-blown desktop or running Windows? As in, Windows beats the popular Linux distros in desktop security?
replies(1): >>15737738 #
7. jlgaddis ◴[] No.15736889[source]
I run both -- but which I'm using at a particular time depends on the particular use case.

For this article's target audience, Qubes OS is the better choice.

8. ◴[] No.15737738{3}[source]