←back to thread

321 points Helloworldboy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
Cthulhu_ ◴[] No.15722757[source]
Yeah this isn't going to fly with Youtube itself, they're not going to host ad-free videos so that a 3rd party can take their nontrivial portion of the ad revenue.

Schemes like this are nice, but don't forget who pays for hosting, serving and promoting the content.

replies(5): >>15722822 #>>15723081 #>>15723534 #>>15724672 #>>15727298 #
Helloworldboy ◴[] No.15722822[source]
I think you might be misunderstanding how it works. Its essentially Patreon. Will it work? Who knows. Can youtube stop it from happening? Probably not any more than they can stop Patreon.
replies(4): >>15722957 #>>15722993 #>>15724269 #>>15724815 #
mnx ◴[] No.15722957[source]
Brave also blocks ads. I would think youtube have a better chance at suing them.
replies(2): >>15723113 #>>15727092 #
1. jMyles ◴[] No.15727092[source]
You really think a jury is going to buy this?

Imagine this for a moment: the Brave browser ships with a VR headset that automatically descends upon the user's eyes and ears for the duration of an ad, shielding them from their own screen (and thus the Youtube ad playing on it) and playing a different ad (or no ad) instead.

Does the same liability still apply?

I think that Brave lawyers will have an easy time convincing a jury that a merely drawing the user's attention to a different piece of content is not tantamount to damages to some website that happens to be among those open in their browser at the time.