←back to thread

321 points Helloworldboy | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.566s | source
Show context
Cthulhu_ ◴[] No.15722757[source]
Yeah this isn't going to fly with Youtube itself, they're not going to host ad-free videos so that a 3rd party can take their nontrivial portion of the ad revenue.

Schemes like this are nice, but don't forget who pays for hosting, serving and promoting the content.

replies(5): >>15722822 #>>15723081 #>>15723534 #>>15724672 #>>15727298 #
Helloworldboy ◴[] No.15722822[source]
I think you might be misunderstanding how it works. Its essentially Patreon. Will it work? Who knows. Can youtube stop it from happening? Probably not any more than they can stop Patreon.
replies(4): >>15722957 #>>15722993 #>>15724269 #>>15724815 #
mnx ◴[] No.15722957[source]
Brave also blocks ads. I would think youtube have a better chance at suing them.
replies(2): >>15723113 #>>15727092 #
Helloworldboy ◴[] No.15723113[source]
Are ad-blocking services generally sued by ad-displaying websites? I've never heard of that happening, but I could certainly be wrong.
replies(3): >>15723340 #>>15723348 #>>15723354 #
detaro ◴[] No.15723348[source]
Not generally, but it has happened. And the Brave business model of "block ads, then show our own ads instead" combined with this type of advertising is probably a clearer target than "some guy making uBlock for free".
replies(2): >>15723722 #>>15723776 #
1. mccr8 ◴[] No.15723776[source]
I don't know about uBlock Origin (which is what you probably meant) but according to press articles AdBlock Plus gets paid money by Google to not block their ads, which feels at least in the ballpark to what Brave is trying to do.
replies(1): >>15723902 #
2. detaro ◴[] No.15723902[source]
The company behind Adblock plus also has been involved in lawsuits about their product (they won, so far)