I'm not sure I do. But it does seem like a good question.
Also:
http://www.art.net/~hopkins/Don/unix-haters/x-windows/disast...
I'm not sure I do. But it does seem like a good question.
Also:
http://www.art.net/~hopkins/Don/unix-haters/x-windows/disast...
Over time they added cooperative multitasking, which meant the foreground app had to consciously give time to let background apps do stuff.
But they could never build a real OS with security and memory protection out of it. So Apple bought NeXT to get industrial strength unix as their core OS, and switched all Apple development to NeXTStep, or at least the modern derivative of it, called Cocoa.
My dust covered Inside Mac volumes were made useless nearly 20 years ago.
You may know, but for readers who don’t: ”they” didn’t, Andy Hertzfeld did (https://www.folklore.org/StoryView.py?story=Switcher.txt)
It helped that he had intimate knowledge of the Mac operating system’s internals, but many of them were documented in Inside Macintosh, and others could have been found with (quite) a bit of effort; one didn’t have to be at Apple or even have access to the system’s source code to implement that.
And those volumes aren’t useless; they are reminders of about the last time hacking an OS was fun :-;