←back to thread

791 points 317070 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
magic_beans ◴[] No.15010269[source]
> Despite that, we paid premium salaries to bring a few women who did well in our interviews. But, they lacked the energy to put us into overdrive. Worse, they were starting to drain the energy from the rest of the team. Eventually, we had to do the right thing for the company and let them go.

This is one of the most disturbing thing's I've ever read in an article proclaiming to promote change in the tech gender gap.

What exactly is this supposed to mean? What exactly does it mean to "lack energy" and to "drain energy" from other people? How on EARTH did she come to this conclusion? And WHY would this be a problem inherent to women? This tells me more about her management style than it does about any woman at her company.

This woman is NOT someone we should be listening to when it comes to closing the gender gap in software engineering.

replies(6): >>15010359 #>>15010367 #>>15010390 #>>15010445 #>>15010467 #>>15013286 #
xenihn ◴[] No.15010390[source]
>What exactly does it mean to "lack energy" and to "drain energy" from other people?

Yeah, it's annoying that she's forcing readers to interpret that. I would guess that she means that they weren't able to perform their job responsibilities adequately, and others had to pick up the slack.

replies(1): >>15011227 #
morgtheborg ◴[] No.15011227[source]
I assume it means they didn't want to work the hours and/or play games at work with their co-workers.
replies(1): >>15012823 #
1. xenihn ◴[] No.15012823{3}[source]
>they didn't want to work the hours

Sadly, that could still fall under what I said.