←back to thread

791 points 317070 | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
okreallywtf ◴[] No.15011848[source]
I see some good points on both sides of the discussion here but one thing occurs to me about the current diversity-pushback that I'm seeing(I'm not going to call it anti-diversity because I think a fair amount of it is well-meaning or at least not explicitly hateful).

We've surprisingly quickly moved from periods where it was common to simply refuse to even consider minorities or women in many fields to a time when many people see political correctness and reverse-racism/sexism as a greater problem than sexism and racism themselves.

I'm glad to see people being very thoughtful about fairness and equality, but I have an honest question: Before quotas and social justice warriors, were you thinking about fairness and equality when the status quo potentially benefited you and excluded others not on their merit but race and gender? I'm asking honestly, not trying to point fingers but I would like to know because this community, while left-leaning on many issues (I think) tends more towards libertarian on issues of race and gender and seems especially defensive when it comes to the tech industry (especially when the term "privilege" is used, it turns downright hostile).

If you were active in supporting equality and diversity (by resisting arbitrarily exclusionary practices) when it wasn't popular to do so and now you are seeing the negative aspects of a push for artificial diversity I would like to know that.

If you have never even considered diversity issues until recently when seeing hiring practices that could negatively affect you I would like to know that too. Do you believe any specific action needs to be taken to promote diversity or will the problem solve itself, or does the problem even exist at all?

replies(7): >>15012205 #>>15012253 #>>15012385 #>>15012700 #>>15013773 #>>15013974 #>>15015686 #
mooseburger ◴[] No.15012205[source]
When was the tech industry deliberately excluding people based on race and gender? The 50s? 60s?

I don't believe any specific action needs to be taken to promote diversity. As far as I can tell, people can work wherever they will, as long as they can pass the interview.

>arbitrarily exclusionary practices

Please name these.

replies(2): >>15012720 #>>15012728 #
1. taysic ◴[] No.15012720[source]
The women who get hired at Google only do so if they pass a stringent interview. So how is this different from what you're saying?
replies(1): >>15012853 #
2. mooseburger ◴[] No.15012853[source]
It isn't. I just don't think lack of biological diversity is a problem for a corporation.
replies(1): >>15022863 #
3. taysic ◴[] No.15022863[source]
It's Google that is voluntarily taking on these policies, no? Wouldn't they know their self-interest better?