←back to thread

791 points 317070 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
magic_beans ◴[] No.15010269[source]
> Despite that, we paid premium salaries to bring a few women who did well in our interviews. But, they lacked the energy to put us into overdrive. Worse, they were starting to drain the energy from the rest of the team. Eventually, we had to do the right thing for the company and let them go.

This is one of the most disturbing thing's I've ever read in an article proclaiming to promote change in the tech gender gap.

What exactly is this supposed to mean? What exactly does it mean to "lack energy" and to "drain energy" from other people? How on EARTH did she come to this conclusion? And WHY would this be a problem inherent to women? This tells me more about her management style than it does about any woman at her company.

This woman is NOT someone we should be listening to when it comes to closing the gender gap in software engineering.

replies(6): >>15010359 #>>15010367 #>>15010390 #>>15010445 #>>15010467 #>>15013286 #
halloij ◴[] No.15010359[source]
> And WHY would this be a problem inherent to women?

Because men and women have entirely different brains. They have entirely different strengths and weaknesses. Hate to break that to you.

The rise of "lets pretend everyone is equal even though they're obviously not" is one of the worst things going on right now.

replies(1): >>15012575 #
1. halloij ◴[] No.15012575[source]
I love that this is getting down-voted. Because the liberal agenda is more important than scientific biological facts to some people :)
replies(1): >>15012681 #
2. sctb ◴[] No.15012681[source]
You're violating the guidelines by complaining about being downvoted for violating the guidelines. Please stop doing this and (re-)read them.

> Please avoid introducing classic flamewar topics unless you have something genuinely new to say about them.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html