←back to thread

383 points imartin2k | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
arekkas ◴[] No.14330355[source]
Time and time again, Uber has shown that undercutting their competitors in pricing is not done through smart technology or better business models, but by avoiding regulations and getting away with inhumane wages.
replies(6): >>14330380 #>>14330402 #>>14330414 #>>14330498 #>>14330636 #>>14330775 #
patrickaljord ◴[] No.14330402[source]
The alternative for many unskilled people would be to be unemployed and having even less income, would that be more or less inhumane?
replies(5): >>14330408 #>>14330423 #>>14330431 #>>14331398 #>>14332293 #
argonaut ◴[] No.14330431[source]
This is essentially an argument against having a minimum wage in general (and more broadly, certain labor regulations). It's a complex issue that we could argue about for pages and pages of comments, but suffice to say the vast majority of the population in the US, let alone Sweden, disagree with you.

Which is that in some cases it is better to have some unemployed people and some (ideally a lot more) people earning a good wage, versus both groups earning a crappy wage. Combined with a welfare system.

replies(3): >>14330521 #>>14330536 #>>14330544 #
eru ◴[] No.14330544[source]
And most economists agree with the grandfather comment..
replies(1): >>14330665 #
jellicle ◴[] No.14330665[source]
Not at all, no. Throughout the world, unemployment is correlated with the local minimum wage - as the minimum wage increases, unemployment decreases. Somalia (no minimum wage) has an unemployment rate of over 60%. Increasing the minimum wage in US states produces no negative employment effects.

There are, of course, paid professional conservative economists who will tell you whatever their bosses want them to in support of pro-billionaire economic policies.

replies(5): >>14330679 #>>14330685 #>>14330741 #>>14330826 #>>14330964 #
patrickaljord ◴[] No.14330679[source]
> Increasing the minimum wage in US states produces no negative employment effects.

Why not increase it to $500 an hour then? When you increase the price of cigarettes, people buy less cigarettes, when you increase the price of cars, people buy less of it. What do you think happens when you increase the price of labor and why do you think it has magic powers that makes it avoid these basic laws of economics?

What about people who prefer to work for Uber for $4 per hour rather than stay unemployed? Would you tell them "Sorry but this is inhumane, I can't let you do that to yourself and I'm ready to vote laws to forbid you to do as you please with your free time and send people like you to jail if they persist"? Do you know better than they do what's best for them and how they can use their own body? Doesn't that make you an authoritarian?

replies(2): >>14330982 #>>14332359 #
Noos ◴[] No.14332359[source]
Do your budget sometime with an effective wage equal to $4 an hour. What does it cover? What can a person do effectively with that $4 an hour? Will it lift them out of poverty? Can they live on an effective wage of $4 an hour working 40 hours a week and even afford shelter and food?

I mean, do people not get how little money this is?

replies(1): >>14353370 #
1. eru ◴[] No.14353370[source]
$0 is even less than $4. So why forbid them from making even those paltry $4?