←back to thread

383 points imartin2k | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.423s | source
Show context
arekkas ◴[] No.14330355[source]
Time and time again, Uber has shown that undercutting their competitors in pricing is not done through smart technology or better business models, but by avoiding regulations and getting away with inhumane wages.
replies(6): >>14330380 #>>14330402 #>>14330414 #>>14330498 #>>14330636 #>>14330775 #
toss1 ◴[] No.14330775[source]
Or, more precisely, Uber is earning by systematically stealing the waiting time of their drivers (e.g., by misleading promotions getting everyone out to wait for orders).

In contrast to Foodora, which pays for shift time plus delivery commission.

Simply, Uber is based on shortchanging everyone but Uber itself and pocketing the difference. Unsustainable, and I always use alternatives.

replies(1): >>14331748 #
1. Scoundreller ◴[] No.14331748[source]
Per the article, Foodora-Stockholm doesn't pay for shift time on weekends. But it sounds like Foodora has work around the clock, but UberEats does not.

The question is: Why is Foodora dominating Uber Eats in Stockholm? Is Uber a late entrant? Shunned by restaurants? Shunned by consumers? Too expensive for restaurants or consumers?

replies(1): >>14332613 #
2. ripperdoc ◴[] No.14332613[source]
Uber Eats is less known in Stockholm and a later entrant.