←back to thread

Amazon Go

(amazon.com)
1247 points mangoman | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.272s | source
1. jedberg ◴[] No.13107730[source]
I suspect during the beta they've asked their employees to try and steal things amd move things to the wrong place -- really push the software.

At least I hope they did. I assume they are going into this expecting a loss while they work out the kinks.

replies(1): >>13107991 #
2. dimino ◴[] No.13107991[source]
Based on comments in here, one would suspect they implemented this entire thing without trying to break it even once.
replies(2): >>13109083 #>>13109766 #
3. vigrante ◴[] No.13109083[source]
So much negativity and pessimism.
4. pwinnski ◴[] No.13109766[source]
No company or government in the history of humanity has managed to foresee the myriad ways dishonest people will try to get away with dishonest things. Many, many, many, many, many companies have severely underestimated the high cost of fraud.

Also, employees trying to break the system are not likely to bringing young kids shopping with them.

The only question I have is who's liable when things are fuzzy: right now, the store bears the liability for things eaten within the store, destroyed while in the store, snuck out, etc. It's easy to see that this technology leads to the liability being pushed onto the shopper for all of those cases, but that will definitely lead to some serious customer-service arguments.

replies(1): >>13110997 #
5. jedberg ◴[] No.13110997{3}[source]
Customers has always been liable for these things. It's only because of customer service nightmares that they aren't. It's really not much different except now they store has slightly better data.