http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/04/the-10-m...
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/04/the-10-m...
http://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/silicon-valley-ha...
Even if they "acknowledge" it, so what? It's not their job to create extra jobs to replace the ones that they've automated out of existence. It's never been the jobs of the companies creating disruptive technology, like farm equipment or cars or computers, to do this.
It wasn't Ford's job to find new jobs for everyone who had a horse-related career; same deal here.
e.g. which society is better to live in:
(low inequality, less wealth)
10th percentile average wealth: 100
99th percentile average wealth: 1000
(high inequality, more wealth)
10th percentile average wealth: 1000
99th percentile average wealth: 1000000
Of course this is an oversimplification, but you get the idea: income inequality is not the only important factor.If the majority of people get 10x the money they used to, they're not getting 10x the purchasing power, because everyone needs a higher salary.
This is also an oversimplification. You can read more about the phenomenon here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_disease
10x more food, land, or whatever.
Just wanted to note that we're really not doing too badly with advancing technology. And if you measure actual poverty as compared to relative poverty, which makes more sense to me, we are doing even better. Have a nice day.
Tell that to all the people who are doing badly? Jesus, it's like people look at some statistics that say the world is ok, and then continue in their totally ignorant life. The world is literally full of people who say it's not good enough.
Technology is advancing, and we're seeing lots of benefits from that -- I think everyone would agree. But advances in technology don't inherently translate into better quality of life. A $500 4K TV screen is amazing, but doesn't make up for the fact that a basic 2-bed apartment now costs $25,000/year. A $650 iPhone super-computer-in-your-pocket is fantastic, but doesn't make up for the fact that a 4-year degree now routinely runs $60,000 or higher.
Extending debt to cover up societies inequality doesn't actually solve inequality, it just hides from view how big of a problem the inequality has become.