←back to thread

Amazon Go

(amazon.com)
1247 points mangoman | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.922s | source | bottom
1. ocdtrekkie ◴[] No.13105914[source]
My first thought is: I don't have a supported smartphone.

The current checkout process entails the acceptance of common legal tender, but this process will require I have their app, and presumably allow it quite a bit of tracking permission.

A cool demo, sure, but I think I'll stick to shopping like the normal folks.

replies(3): >>13105968 #>>13106101 #>>13106143 #
2. JorgeGT ◴[] No.13105968[source]
It's interesting that they talk abut a supported smartphone. If it was just computer vision looking at what you grab you would only need a printed card with the QR that the folk in the video uses to check-in.

So, probably there's something needed from the phone as well: NFC, low energy Bluetooth, inertial location tracking? I guess that we will see when we look at the supported devices list.

3. gdulli ◴[] No.13106101[source]
If there's two things I get uneasy about, it's (1) giving up privacy in a whole new category of being filmed/monitored/tracked and (2) being guided into behaviors that encourage me to consume more and consume more casually.
replies(1): >>13106169 #
4. TulliusCicero ◴[] No.13106143[source]
The left-wing viewpoint on this is going to be that it's an economy that increasingly works against low-income/homeless people (who are less likely to own a smartphone or always have it charged and on them). Sure when it's a one-off, no big deal, but if it lets a store have lower prices and provide a better customer experience, then more and more stores will adopt it.
5. giarc ◴[] No.13106169[source]
If you've ever entered a grocery store, both of those things have already happened.
replies(1): >>13106376 #
6. gdulli ◴[] No.13106376{3}[source]
It's imperfect and unable to be completely avoided, but worse to move the line further in the wrong direction.