←back to thread

668 points wildmusings | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
seanalltogether ◴[] No.13027203[source]
The tension that The_Donald and many alt-right subreddits place on reddit in general seems to be reaching a boiling point. I get the feeling the admins are just waiting for a credible reason to present itself that lets them cleanly wipe out all of them.
replies(3): >>13027254 #>>13027290 #>>13027671 #
gottam ◴[] No.13027290[source]
What is the tension about exactly? That they don't align with their own personal political views?
replies(8): >>13027310 #>>13027327 #>>13027963 #>>13027988 #>>13028217 #>>13028220 #>>13028455 #>>13030247 #
bcherny ◴[] No.13027327[source]
I think it's more about the way they express their opinions, rather than the content of those opinions.

Posting in ALL CAPS, posting fake news or insults to other members of the community, posting to incite anger, etc. does not make for good discussion, and hurts the sense of community. That, and bringing that to other subreddits via brigading, etc.

replies(3): >>13027356 #>>13027390 #>>13027474 #
a_bonobo ◴[] No.13027390[source]
Plus heaps of users browse /r/all and the the_donald community is so large, and the upvotes come so quickly (some insist it's upvoting bots since it's so fast) that the top of /r/all is often the_donald. Right now the nr. 1 post and another one on all are from the_donald.
replies(9): >>13027495 #>>13027592 #>>13027741 #>>13028084 #>>13029040 #>>13029961 #>>13029984 #>>13030033 #>>13030499 #
551199 ◴[] No.13027592[source]
During election they modified their algo to avoid the_donald posts getting to front page.
replies(4): >>13028023 #>>13028026 #>>13028068 #>>13029217 #
ajacksified ◴[] No.13028068[source]
(ex-reddit employee, employed during the changes) - we'd been designing changes to the algorithm to not be just a few top subreddits, and to instead show more variety well before r/the_donald even started; in fact, it was one of the first things Steve took on when he came back. There's no anti-r/the_donald conspiracy; there's much less discussion about them internally than they'd like to believe.
replies(2): >>13028165 #>>13028678 #
vxNsr ◴[] No.13028678[source]
I believe there were two edits from the time /r/the_donald became popular, the first was a more general edit as you say, but the second if I recall correctly was all about keeping the /r/the_donald from the top. Though it seemed to have backfired because after the second edit I saw more of them on /r/all not less.
replies(1): >>13030835 #
1. 551199 ◴[] No.13030835[source]
Yes, the second edit backfired massively.

The reason pretty much all posts in the_donald are upvoted by users is due to the fact Clintons Correct the record was downvoting the_donald posts in hordes.

Again if Reddit would not have aligned themselves with one candidate named Clinton they probably wouldn't have this problem now.