←back to thread

668 points wildmusings | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
JorgeGT ◴[] No.13027099[source]
And without an "edited" mark, which means that any comment of any user can be covertly modified by an admin. Very concerning since Reddit comments have provoked even Congress hearings: http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/296680-house-pan...
replies(7): >>13027119 #>>13027125 #>>13027136 #>>13027240 #>>13027734 #>>13028391 #>>13033721 #
69mlgsniperdad ◴[] No.13027734[source]
I highly doubt secretly editing a comment of another user is one of his account's listed privledges. Not marked edited, I highly doubt its a built-in feature of the website for even administrators. What if a low level employee, who doesn't even have privilege to ban users, had leveraged his technical back-end access to their databases to alter a comment. Act as the person who made the original comment, effectively impersonating them by using their technical access to reddit's data to basically 'hack' that users account. I highly doubt this is 'within his rights' as a founder, as someone here commented...
replies(1): >>13028371 #
defgeneric ◴[] No.13028371[source]
At the same time though, you'd imagine reddit has some sort of distributed backend so that getting direct access to the datastore and doing something like

    UPDATE the_donald SET comment = replace('/u/spez', '/u/notspez', comment) WHERE 'fuck /u/spez' in lowercase(comment);
would create massive consistency headaches.
replies(1): >>13029261 #
1. iso-8859-1 ◴[] No.13029261[source]
Reddit has the infrastructure for censorship, they have had to remove content before.
replies(1): >>13039473 #
2. samstave ◴[] No.13039473[source]
True but thats not what we are talking about