It's one thing to "complaining about",,, generalizations. It's entirely different for a CEO to abuse his power and censor those he disagrees with on a social media site.
He should be let go for this! He is literally putting words in peoples mouths!!
It calls into question the credibility of the whole site.
0. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election...
1. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/78761255265415577...
2. http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/22/13714052/d...
3. https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/trump-revokes...
4. http://money.cnn.com/2016/06/14/media/donald-trump-media-bla...
Let's say that instead of allowing you to express this last comment - he used his admin privileges and made your comment PRO trump.
Do you see the difference? Having a strong opposing - even annoying - demanding - opinion is not the same as impersonating others and censoring their words.
HUGE HUGE DIFFERENCE
Does that make sense?
The next president is making a bunch of public actions that will be critiqued, audited, and probably checked / balanced as the government was set up to do. The CEO of reddit is SECRETLY tampering / modifying the "speech" and content of private citizens without any checks, balances, or even repercussions (so far).
I'd also argue that reddit has a more direct engagement model with private citizens that makes this hit closer to home (i.e. if we actually were real-life friends, or internet buddies for years, and one of our messages/comments to each other was modified that could cause far more direct impact — e.g. "you" convince me to commit a crime because you have my trust as a "personal" friend)
I'm honestly surprised he publicly admitted to it at all, and I'd further be shocked if he doesn't end up stepping down because of this incident.
I guess my true point is the hypocrisy of T_D users complaining about spez's actions when the man they are so fond of is doing the same. Except he's the president.
This is not a partisan issue??? It's not the "T_D users complaining" that put it all over HN's.
It's unacceptable for CEO's of social media companies to impersonate users. EVER > EVER > EVER.
He could have deleted or changed the comments and posted a note and most of the outrage would go away, but he didn't. He impersonated and censored users comments. Such a slippery slope.