←back to thread

Reddit CEO admits to altering user comments that were critical of him

(www.reddit.com)
668 points wildmusings | 1 comments | 24 Nov 16 00:50 UTC | HN request time: 0.24s | source
Show context
JorgeGT ◴[24 Nov 16 01:04 UTC] No.13027099[source]▶
And without an "edited" mark, which means that any comment of any user can be covertly modified by an admin. Very concerning since Reddit comments have provoked even Congress hearings: http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/296680-house-pan...
replies(7): >>13027119 #>>13027125 #>>13027136 #>>13027240 #>>13027734 #>>13028391 #>>13033721 #
dhruval ◴[24 Nov 16 01:29 UTC] No.13027240[source]▶
He changed a 'F U CEO' (upvoted by 1.6k users) comment to 'F U unpaid reddit moderator', without any indication that the comment was edited.

Very juvenile and unprofessional way of dealing with the situation, really erodes trust in the platform (simply deleting the comment would have been a better response).

Would maybe expect this from the founder of a young fledgling startup, but the 33 year old CEO of a company like Reddit ought to know better.

replies(7): >>13027341 #>>13027345 #>>13027894 #>>13028550 #>>13028557 #>>13031901 #>>13032509 #
kordless ◴[24 Nov 16 01:47 UTC] No.13027341[source]▶
It's well within his power to change a comment. What's not cool is that he changed it to a lie. If he's the CEO, he's paid.
replies(4): >>13027372 #>>13027414 #>>13027477 #>>13027712 #
1. SilasX ◴[24 Nov 16 03:10 UTC] No.13027712[source]▶
It generally shouldn't be. It's my understanding that once you take on the investment and corporate governance that Reddit has, you'll have "need to know" controls in place that prevent the appropriation of company resources for personal use -- so even the CEO doesn't have the kind of unrestricted database access needed to do this kind of thing.