←back to thread

668 points wildmusings | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
JorgeGT ◴[] No.13027099[source]
And without an "edited" mark, which means that any comment of any user can be covertly modified by an admin. Very concerning since Reddit comments have provoked even Congress hearings: http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/296680-house-pan...
replies(7): >>13027119 #>>13027125 #>>13027136 #>>13027240 #>>13027734 #>>13028391 #>>13033721 #
dhruval ◴[] No.13027240[source]
He changed a 'F U CEO' (upvoted by 1.6k users) comment to 'F U unpaid reddit moderator', without any indication that the comment was edited.

Very juvenile and unprofessional way of dealing with the situation, really erodes trust in the platform (simply deleting the comment would have been a better response).

Would maybe expect this from the founder of a young fledgling startup, but the 33 year old CEO of a company like Reddit ought to know better.

replies(7): >>13027341 #>>13027345 #>>13027894 #>>13028550 #>>13028557 #>>13031901 #>>13032509 #
kordless ◴[] No.13027341[source]
It's well within his power to change a comment. What's not cool is that he changed it to a lie. If he's the CEO, he's paid.
replies(4): >>13027372 #>>13027414 #>>13027477 #>>13027712 #
1. JorgeGT ◴[] No.13027372[source]
One thing is to visibly edit a comment like they do in StackExchange. Impersonating a user is a very different thing.