←back to thread

Google's “Director of Engineering” Hiring Test

(www.gwan.com)
1764 points fatihky | 1 comments | 13 Oct 16 15:15 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
endtime ◴[13 Oct 16 15:51 UTC] No.12701581[source]▶
I've been at Google for five years as a SWE and I've been interviewing for 3 of those. I'd fail this pop quiz.

This strikes me as bizarre and inconsistent with all the practices I'm aware of. The idea that we'd ask anyone this stuff, let alone director candidates, strains belief.

replies(12): >>12701640 #>>12701643 #>>12701658 #>>12701733 #>>12701749 #>>12701794 #>>12701870 #>>12701876 #>>12701992 #>>12702271 #>>12702863 #>>12703202 #
caoilte ◴[13 Oct 16 16:35 UTC] No.12701992[source]▶
The only way this makes "sense" is if you already have the candidate (or pool of H1-B candidates) you want in mind, but have to prove you opened up the position to the general public first.
replies(3): >>12702157 #>>12702169 #>>12707298 #
vthallam ◴[13 Oct 16 16:56 UTC] No.12702169[source]▶
I know some companies do this, but this is Google. There's no incentive for them to hire H1-B's if a equally qualified American citizen is available, since they are going to pay equal salary.
replies(2): >>12702449 #>>12702842 #
spcelzrd ◴[13 Oct 16 17:25 UTC] No.12702449[source]▶
They don't have to offer the same salary, just salary in the same range. That range can be pretty wide ($20k+)

Employees on an H1-B visa have drastically less job mobility than US Citizens. This creates a power advantage for the employer.

>but this is Google

Google has, in the past, illegally conspired to prevent other companies from recruiting their employees. This lowers wages and reduces employee mobility. Clearly there's incentive because they have literally broken the law in the past to achieve these results.

replies(2): >>12702654 #>>12703779 #
1. vthallam ◴[13 Oct 16 20:29 UTC] No.12703779{3}[source]▶
I have some friends on H1B who work there and also other top tech companies, trust me there's no discrimination in salary. With the extra legal fee, i think it's a burden for them to have people on temp visas.