←back to thread

1764 points fatihky | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.228s | source
Show context
danharaj ◴[] No.12701629[source]
Mediocre people can't evaluate exceptional people. What mediocre people think is knowledgeable can't be exceptional knowledge, by definition. If you want to find exceptional directors of engineering, you need an exceptional person worthy of being director of engineering to evaluate them.

In seeking victory, not going beyond what everyone knows / is not skilled.

Victory in battle that all-under-heaven calls skilled / is not skilled.

Thus lifting an autumn hair does not mean / great strength.

Seeing the sun and moon does not mean a / clear eye.

Hearing thunder does not mean a keen ear.

So-called skill is to be victorious over the easily / defeated.

Thus the battles of the skilled are without / extraordinary victory, without reputation for / wisdom and without merit for courage.

- Sun Tzu Ch. 4 (Denma translation)

replies(1): >>12702503 #
noploop[dead post] ◴[] No.12702503[source]
Bullshit. If Pierre was actually smart he would be able to judge the level of the interviewer and give the answers required. And if he had any self confidence at all he wouldn't have the need to boast about this on his blog.
1. danharaj ◴[] No.12703155[source]
I... disagree? Like? The questions were OK questions, it was the answers that were asinine and clearly not meant to gauge anything except the ability to skim wikipedia pages about computer science.