←back to thread

1764 points fatihky | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.727s | source
Show context
plinkplonk ◴[] No.12701464[source]
Is this for real? Wow. Reads like someone spoofing the real Google interview.

For "Director of Engineering" they have a technical illiterate (nothing wrong with that, in other contexts) check for literal matches of answers? the mind boggles.

(I'm really having a hard time believing this is for real)

replies(4): >>12701493 #>>12701563 #>>12702303 #>>12702513 #
1. cookiecaper ◴[] No.12701563[source]
Believe it. The depths of corporate absurdity know few bounds.
replies(1): >>12702001 #
2. DannyBee ◴[] No.12702001[source]
On what data are you basing this?
replies(2): >>12702316 #>>12702502 #
3. spb ◴[] No.12702316[source]
There's no reason to sealion this, but here's a recent article that talks about exactly this topic: https://aeon.co/essays/you-don-t-have-to-be-stupid-to-work-h...
4. reitanqild ◴[] No.12702502[source]
Possibly same as everyone else: Been applying for a few jobs over the years ;-)