←back to thread

1764 points fatihky | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
1. nurettin ◴[] No.12701557[source]
Perhaps they are looking for a pointy-haired-boss type rather than someone who actually knows his thing.
replies(1): >>12704503 #
2. clifanatic ◴[] No.12704503[source]
Sorry, you got too many right, you're not right for this role!

Actually, come to think of it, I did have an interview experience like that, just a few years ago. At the time, my title was VP of engineering, but for a small startup. A bigger company was interested in hiring me for a VP-level (or maybe director level, I can't remember) position, and phone screened me. After about ten minutes of talking, he said, "are you sure you wouldn't be more interested in our technical architecture team? You sound like a good fit for our technical architecture team".

replies(1): >>12706055 #
3. nurettin ◴[] No.12706055[source]
Thing is, mortals like I know very little about workspace psychology compared to large scale operations such as Google. I have an inkling of an idea because I was repeatedly subjected to the same problematic environment too many times in my 10 year career as a simple software developer with no lead titles.

Off the top of my head:

There is always someone incompetent getting paid more than you. I think this means they are willing to spend money on someone else so you work harder to reach his/her status like a horse going after a carrot it will never reach.

There is always some kind of boss who will not indulge in technical details in order to understand how long a project would really take before pitching the idea to a customer. This is their way of "getting things done" or "making hard things a reality".